Faith and Border Ethics: Immigration and Human Dignity in Trump's America

Border

Panel Discussion

Kristin Heyer,听Boston College

Daniel Kanstroom,听Boston College Law School

Hosffman Ospino,听Boston College School of Theology and Ministry

Peter Skerry,听Boston College聽

顿补迟别:听September 26, 2018

View Event Flyer

Read Interview

Abstract

Crossing borders, for any nation, is as necessary as maintaining them. America, commonly touted as a nation of immigrants, was quickly defined by her borders: oceanic and political borders that were crossed in order to found her, and the national borders which rapidly expanded, across peoples and land, in order to define her.聽People have been crossing America's borders from the birth of America. However, it is also America's heritage to limit who can cross, why they can cross, and when. Immigration policy throughout American history is proof of this, and the agonizing images of children being separated from their parents at U.S.-Mexico border this past summer were a stark, recent, reminder of how quickly immigration policy can become depersonalized and inhumane. As people interested in the study and role of religion in public life, can we define an ethics of borders?聽

Speaker Bios

Kristin E. Heyer

Kristin E. Heyer聽is a professor of theology at Boston College, where she teaches on Chrsitian ethics, specifically social ethics, migration ethics, and moral agency. Her research interests also include questions of Catholic social thought, and religion and politics.聽Heyer's books include聽Kinship Across Borders: A Christian Ethic of Immigration聽(Georgetown University Press, 2012) 补苍诲听Prophetic and Public: the Social Witness of U.S. Catholicism聽(Georgetown University Press, 2006), which won the College Theology Society鈥檚 鈥淏est Book Award." She has also published the co-edited volumes聽Conscience and Catholicism: Rights, Responsibilities and Institutional Responses聽(Orbis Press, 2015) 补苍诲听Catholics and Politics: Dynamic Tensions between Faith and Power聽(Georgetown University Press, 2008). Heyer's articles have appeared in聽Theological Studies,听The Journal of Catholic Social Thought, The Journal of Peace and Justice Studies,听Political Theology, Asian Horizons聽补苍诲听America.聽She received her B.A. from Brown University and her Ph.D. in Theological Ethics from Boston College in 2003.听听

Daniel Kanstroom

Daniel Kanstroom聽is a professor of law, Thomas F. Carney Distinguished Scholar, faculty director of the Rappaport Center for Law & Public Policy, director of the International Human Rights Program, and an associate director of the Boston College Center for Human Rights and International Justice. Kanstroom has published widely in the fields of U.S. immigration law, criminal law, and European citizenship and asylum law. His most recent book is聽Aftermath: Deportation Law and the New American Diaspora, (Oxford University Press, 2012).聽He is also a co-editor of聽The New Deportations Delirium聽(editor, with M. Brinton Lykes) 补苍诲听Constructing 鈥淚llegality鈥: Immigrant Experiences, Critiques, and Resistance, (editor, with Cecilia Menj铆var) (Cambridge University Press, 2013). His articles and short pieces have appeared in such venues as the聽Harvard Law Review, Yale Journal of International Law, UCLA Law Review, NYU Journal of International Law and Politics, Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, The New York Times, Journal of Social History, and the French聽Gazette du Palais. He has been a visiting professor at the University of Paris, the University of Boulogne sur Mer, Northeastern School of Law, American University, King鈥檚 College, London, and Vermont Law School. Kanstroom earned his A.B. from the State University of New York at Binghamton, his J.D. from Northeastern University, and his LL.M. from Harvard University.

Hosffman Ospino

Hosffman Ospino聽is associate professor of Hispanic ministry and religious education at the Boston College School of Theology and Ministry. Ospino earned his M.A. in theology with a concentration in Church History and a Ph.D. in Theology and Education from Boston College. His research interests focus on the conversation between theology and culture and how that conversation influences Catholic catechesis, theological education, and ministry. In 2014 he was the principal investigator for the National Study of Catholic Parishes in the United States and in 2016 was co-principal investigator for the National Survey of Catholic Schools Serving Hispanic Families, the first ever study of its kind. Recent publications include聽Hispanic Ministry in the Twenty-First Century: Urgent Matters聽(Convivium Press, 2016), and聽Hispanic Ministry in Catholic Parishes: A Summary Report of Findings from the National Study of Catholic Parishes with Hispanic Ministry聽(Our Sunday Visitor Press, 2016).

Peter Skerry

Peter Skerry聽is a professor of political science at Boston College and a Nonresident Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution, with a research focus on social policy, racial and ethnic politics, and immigration. His writings on politics, racial and ethnic issues, immigration and social policy have appeared in a variety of scholarly and general interest publications, including聽Society,听Publius,听The Journal of Policy History,听The New Republic,听Slate,听The Public Interest,听The Wilson Quarterly,听National Review,听The New York Times,听The Los Angeles Times,听The Wall Street Journal, 补苍诲听The Washington Post. His book,听Mexican Americans: The Ambivalent Minority聽(Harvard University Press, 1993), was awarded the 1993 Los Angeles Times Book Prize. His most recent book is聽Counting on the Census? Race, Group Identity, and the Evasion of Politics, (Brookings Institution Press, 2000). His current project is a study of the social, cultural, and political integration of Muslims and Arabs in the United States. Skerry has been a Fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, DC, and served as director of Washington Programs for the University of California at Los Angeles鈥 Center for American Politics and Public Policy, where he also taught political science. He received a B.A. from Tufts Universty and a M.A. and Ph.D. from Harvard University.聽

Event Photos

Boisi event

From right to left: Moderator Mark Massa, S.J., Peter Skerry, Daniel Kanstroom, Kristin E. Heyer, and Hosffman Ospino discuss the question "Can we define an ethics of borders?"

Boisi event

Kristin E. Heyer, of the Boston College theology department, makes a point.

Boisi event

Erik Owens, former Boisi Center associate director and current director of the international studies program at Boston College, asks a question.

Boisi event

Shot of the crowd, made up of 热点爆料入口 faculty, graduate and undergraduate students, and community members

Boisi event

Christian Henkel, Boisi Center visiting scholar, asks a question. (Photos by MTS Photography)

Event Recap

Are borders necessary for modern nation-states? If so, what is the role of a border and what are its ethical implications? On Wednesday, September 26, 2018, the Boisi Center held a panel discussion of these questions with Kristin Heyer (Boston College), Daniel Kanstroom (Boston College Law School), Hosffman Ospino (Boston College School of Theology and Ministry), and Peter Skerry (Boston College).

Opening the discussion, Kanstroom spoke of the constructed nature of borders that often incites racism and racial discrimination, and ought to push a consideration of open borders. Heyer and Ospino agreed that borders ought to be open, but for different reasons. Heyer argued that open borders are needed on some level for the exchange of international capital. Ospino argued that nation-state borders ought to be understood as inherently open rather than unchanging; shifts in the natural land over time remind us of the politically constructed nature of modern borders. This constructed nature also makes them necessary, however, as Skerry reminded us that it is through borders that a political community is often defined and understood.

The conversation shifted to discuss the role of Trump and the rhetoric surrounding the U.S. border today. Skerry and Kanstroom both agreed that the contemporary rhetoric employed by the Trump Administration is a culmination of the past forty years of fears and anxieties of the American public; especially after 9/11. These anxieties include national security, protection of the rule of law, and border security. Heyer added that during times of economic downturns these anxieties are exacerbated and can take the form of xenophobia and racism.

Our discussion of borders turned to who is kept out and who is let in. Is it ethical to deny entrance at the border? If so, to whom? In Western nation-states, we often happily welcome immigrants who look like us, who bring wealth and social capital. Ospino argued that denying immigrants entrance based on their race and socioeconomic status is not morally permissible; we have an obligation to attend to the poor. Heyer reminded us that legal distinctions are necessary to help clarify the discussion, distinctions like that between migrants and refugees. The media鈥檚 focus on urgent symptoms often shadow the root causes of these issues and the complexities of these distinctions. Skerry furthered that when the public overlooks the fears and anxieties spoken of earlier, elite corporations are able to prey on those anxieties to serve their own hiring interests. Corporations have an interest in hiring cheap, undocumented immigrant labor; the fear that immigrants are taking American jobs misses the root cause and further perpetuates it. The media and political analysts鈥 quieted voices on these class interests leave the question at the border to only arise as the symptoms arise. Without treating the root cause and attending to the need for complex distinctions among kinds of immigrants, ineffective border legislation abounds.

The Q&A portion of the panel focused on the role of Christian ethics regarding the recent family separation at the U.S. border. Heyer reminded us that Christian ethics compel a strong interest in and protection of the family as essential to the good of the society. The separations at the border will have consequences not only for the individuals involved who may suffer psychological trauma, but also for society as a whole.

Read More

Books聽 聽 聽 聽

Heyer, Kristin E.聽Kinship across Borders: A Christian Ethic of Immigration. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2012.

Hoffsman, Ospino.聽Hispanic Ministry in the Twenty-First Century: Urgent Matters. Miami: Convivium Press, 2016.

Kanstroom, Daniel.聽Aftermath: Deportation Law and the New American Diaspora. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Leal, David L., and Jos茅 E. Lim贸n, eds.聽Immigration and the Border: Politics and Policy in the New Latino Century. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2013.

Wong, Tom K.聽Rights, Deportation, and Detention in the Age of Immigration Control. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2015.

Articles聽 聽 听听

Bier, David. 鈥淲hy the Wall Won鈥檛 Work.鈥澛Cato Institute, May 2017,听

Chac贸n, Jennifer M. 鈥淎 Diversion of Attention? Immigration Courts and the Adjudication of Fourth and Fifth Amendment Rights.鈥澛Duke Law Journal聽(2010): 1563-1633.

Maldonado, M. et al. 鈥淟atino Incorporation and Racialized Border Politics in the Heartland: Interior Enforcement and Policeability in an English-Only State.鈥澛American Behavioral Scientist聽58, no. 14 (2014): 1927-945.

Matheis, Christian. 鈥淯S American Border Crossings: Immigrants, Poverty and Suzanne Pharr鈥檚鈥 Myth of Scarcity.鈥澛Philosophy in the Contemporary World聽18, no. 2 (2011): 47-59.

Reihan, Salam. 鈥淏orders, but Why?鈥澛National Review, September 26, 2016,听

Other Resources聽 聽 聽 聽

鈥淭he Battle over the Border: Public Opinion on Immigration and Cultural Change at the Forefront of the Election.鈥 A roundtable discussion at the Brookings Institution. June 23, 2016,听听听

鈥淚mmigration by the Numbers.鈥 An interactive graphic by the Brookings Institution. August 15, 2017,听

Read More

In his聽聽entitled,听鈥淏order Politics,鈥 barrister Julian Burnside travels the globe to examine the state of human rights protections in the twenty-first century. Grounded in case studies of antiterrorism legislation in Australia and other western countries, he discovers that political leaders are leveraging fears around border policy to augment political power and challenge postwar democratic principles.

Video